comparison of the incidence, nature and cause of injuries sustained on grass and new generation artificial turf by male and female football players. part 2: training injuries

Abstract objective: to compare the incidence, nature, severity and causes of training injuries suffered by male and female football players on a new generation of artificial lawns and grasslands.


Methods: The injury monitoring system of the National College Sports Association was used twice. season (
August-December)
A prospective study on the participation of American college football teams (
2005 Season: Team 52 for men and team 64 for women;
2006 season: Team 54 for men and team 72 for women).
Injury definitions and recording procedures are in line with the international manufacturers consensus statement on football injury epidemiology studies.
The sports coach recorded the details of the venue and the location, diagnosis, severity and cause of all training injuries.
The number of days lost in training and competition was used to determine the severity of the injury.
Training exposure (player hours)
Record based on team.
Results: the overall incidence of male training injuries was 3.
34 people were injured/1000 were on the artificial lawn and 3 hours. 01 on grass (
The incidence rate is 1. 11;
Woman: artificial turf 1. 94, grass 2.
23. Female: artificial lawn 0. 47, grass 0. 56; pu200a=u200a0. 45).
Conclusion: there is no significant difference in the incidence, severity, nature or cause of training injuries suffered by men or women on a new generation of

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Launceston cardiologist Dr James Mau joins Charles Clinic Health Care team

How Dogs Communicate with Their Ears

How to Make a Bouncy Ball